← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2427/2023disposed off

Bapu Barku Kadam Deceased Through Gayabai Bapu Kadam v. Dropadabai Dnyandeo Kadam And Others

2023-04-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi2 pages

918-WP-2427-23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2427 OF 2023 Bapu Barku Kadam Deceased, through L.Rs.

Gayabai Bapu Kadam .... Petitioner

Versus

Dropadabai Dnyandeo Kadam and others .... Respondents ......

Mr. S.D. Kotkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Manjushri Narwade, Advocate h/f Mr. V.P. Narwade, Advocate for respondent No.1 ......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 19th APRIL, 2023 ORDER :

1.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Trial Court dated 16/02/2023, thereby vacating the status-quo order passed in favour of the petitioner. 2.

Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned advocate for the respondent No.1. Perused the memo of writ petition, annexures thereto and the impugned order. 3.

By filing the suit, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Tahsildar in Rasta Case No.15 of 2015, in favour of the respondent. However, the Trial Court erroneously vacated the status-quo order by the impugned order.

918-WP-2427-23 It is further submitted that application Exhibit-5 is kept for final hearing on 25/04/2023.

4.

Learned advocate for respondent No.1 vehemently opposed the petition, stating that respondents have no alternate way to approach their respective fields, and the Trial Court is justified in vacating the status-quo order. 5.

Considering the fact that status-quo order was operating in favour of the petitioner since 16/01/2023, and as the application Exhibit-5 is kept for hearing on 25/04/2023, it is desirable to continue the status-quo order till 25/04/2023. 6.

In the result, the writ petition is allowed.

7.

The order of status-quo passed in favour of the petitioner shall continue to operate till 25/04/2023. 8.

The trial Court shall decide the application Exhibit-5 on that day on its own merits and without being influenced by the continuation of status-quo order in favour of the petitioner. 9.

Parties shall co-operate.

[ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE S.P. Rane