Santosh Balaji Kantewar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

(1) 914-915-916

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2324 OF 2020 IN WP/2473/2020 BALAJI BHAGVAT YAMBARE ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS AND 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2325 OF 2020 DIPMALA PARASRAM SUKRE ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS AND 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2327 OF 2020 IN WP/2442/2020 SANTOSH BALAJI KANTEWAR ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Chandrakant R. Thorat, Advocate for the Applicants in all CA.

Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondents-State. ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATED : 21st FEBRUARY, 2020.

PER COURT:- 1.

Motions are made for modification of the order dated 10.02.2020.

(2) 914-915-916 2.

It is submitted that applicants require the tribe certificate in the Central Government format. The same is not mentioned in the order. 3.

We had observed that the corrected tribe certificate shall be issued to petitioners within six weeks. The same would also mean corrected tribe certificates in the format for which petitioners applied. The learned counsel submits that petitioners had applied for the tribe certificate in the Central Government format. 4.

In light of that in line nos.7 and 8 after words "corrected tribe certificates", the following words be added:

"including the tribe certificates in Central Government format."

5.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/February-2020