Shaikh Nadim Shaikh Mobin v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2024:BHC-AUG:10120 (1) 910ba365.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 365 OF 2024 SHAIKH NADIM SHAIKH MOBIN ....Applicant

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Mr. Shaikh Wajeed Ahmed, Advocate for the applicant Mrs. D. S. Jape, APP for the respondents/State CORAM :

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

08th MAY, 2024 P. C.

1.

Heard both the sides.

2.

When this court expressed its disinclination to allow the application, the learned advocate for the applicant on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted.

3.

Considering the nature of the offence, it would be proper to direct the trial court to hear the case as expeditiously

(2) 910ba365.24 as possible in any case within six months. The trial court shall conduct the case by fixing the dates at least twice in a week. Needless to mention the word 'Sessions' means once it is started, it shall not be stopped till conclusion. The trial court to note that if the trial is not concluded within time, the applicant is entitled for filing an application for granting bail on the ground of right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India before the trial court.

[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.] VishalK/910ba365.24