← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2745/2025disposed off

Prakash Tukaram Gulzerwad v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2025-02-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:5440-DB 910 WP NO. 2745 OF 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2745 OF 2025 PRAKASH TUKARAM GULZERWAD

VERSUS

1. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHATMA PHULE BACKWARD CLASS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,SHOP NO. 25/2, JUHU SUPREME SHOPPING CENTER, NO. 9, JVPD SCHEME, GULMOHAR CROSS ROAD, JUHU, MUMBAI - 49

3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, MAHATMA PHULE BACKWARD CLASS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, PLOT NO. 4, NS-4, CIDCO N-4, PUNDLIK NAGAR, CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR, DIST. CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR

4. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHATMA PHULE BACKWARD CLASS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, NEAR RAMKRUSHN LODGE, NAIR NAGAR, DIST. HINGOLI.

...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Mahadevappa Vibhute AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S. R. Yadav - Lonikar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 : Mr. D. K. Thote ...

CORAM

:

MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ.

DATE : 25.02.2025 PER COURT :

.

We have heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Thote, who appears suo motu for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. 1/2

910 WP NO. 2745 OF 2025 2.

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's proposal for validation of the tribe certificate has been pending with respondent - committee; however, the petitioner stands superannuated on 30.09.2023. He submits that the petitioner has been granted pension but not the gratuity and the leave encashment benefits. He submits that according to the policy of the Government, the petitioner would appear before the committee and file an affidavit to the fact that he will not press for adjudication of the proposal, and the respondents may independently consider his claim for gratuity and leave encashment benefits, as has been consistently held by various division benches in similar facts. 3.

The learned advocate for respondent No. 2 submits that the corporation would extend the benefits of gratuity and leave encashment to the petitioner.

4.

We dispose of the writ petition by permitting the petitioner to appear before respondent - scrutiny committee, file an affidavit as indicated hereinabove, and furnish its copy to respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Upon receipt, the respondents shall release the gratuity and leave encashment benefits to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, within eight (08) weeks thereafter. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 2/2