← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2377/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Lata Sudhakar Pagar v. The Chief Executive Officer Zp Aurangabad And Another

2017-04-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala2 pages

1 74-WP-2377.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2377 OF 2016 LATA SUDHAKAR PAGAR

VERSUS

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER -- Mr.D.R.Irale-Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr.D.K.Rajput, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 -- CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 03, 2017 PER COURT :

Heard Mr.Irale-Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Rajput, learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2.

2.

Mr.Irale-Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents may be directed to finalise the proposal for pensionary benefits in respect of the petitioner.

3.

The husband of the petitioner died in service. The reversion order issued to the husband

2 74-WP-2377.odt of the petitioner was set aside by this Court, which fact is not disputed by any of the parties. Therefore, the defence of the respondents that the husband of the petitioner was not working as Civil Engineering Assistant at the time of his death, does not survive.

4.

In view of the above, the respondents shall process the papers of pensionary benefits in respect of the petitioner, expeditiously and preferably, within a period of four months from the date of this order. The respondents shall communicate to the petitioner the compliance, if any, to be made by the petitioner. The petitioner shall make the compliance, if any, communicated by the respondents.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] kbp