Sandeep Bhausaheb Khatal And Others v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGBAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4305 OF 2015 IN WP/7654/2011 SANDEEP BHAUSAHEB KHATAL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Shirsath P.B.

AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.V. Tele Advocate for Respondent no.3 : Mr. S.T. Shelke ...

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.

Dated: May 07, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

This matter is moved for speaking to the minutes. It appears that, inadvertently in clause no.3 of the order dated 21st April, 2015, instead of mentioning "the application is disposed of accordingly", it is mentioned as "the Petition is disposed of accordingly." Word Petition be substituted by application.

3.

So also, instead of mentioning "Respondent No.3 is directed", it is mentioned as "Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are directed". The Respondent No. 2 and 3 be substituted by Respondent No.3. 4.

Accordingly corrected copy of the order be placed on record. Fresh writ be issued. Motion is disposed of accordingly. ( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ...

sga/-