Sambha @ Sambhaji Vishwanath Thote v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.1147/2014 Sambha @ Sambhaji Vishwanath Thote ...

Appellant

Versus

The state of Maharashtra ...

Respondents & others None present

CORAM:

VIJAY S.KULKARNI REGISTRAR (JUDL) DATED:

13/01/2015 1.

Perused record and proceeding. The objection notified by the office is that the printing charges have not been paid by the appellant though sufficient time was given to the appellant. There is no representation on behalf of appellant. No steps have been taken to deposit the printing charges. Thus, it appears that appellant is not interested in taking steps and to pay the printing charges. In the result, I proceed to pass following order.

The printing charges have not been paid by the appellant, hence appeal stands dismissed for failure to prosecute. REGISTRAR (JUDL) cnd.fa1147.14