← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/1310/2016application allowed

Udhav Kisanrao Tandle And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra

2016-03-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.T. Joshi4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1310 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.108 OF 2016 1] Udhav Kisanrao Tandle, 2] Deepak Panditrao Salve, 3] Mahesh Udhavrao Tandle, 4] Rahul Udhavrao Tandle, 5] Mangesh Udhavrao Tandle ..Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent -- Mr.R.G.Hange, advocate for applicants Mr.R.B.Bagul, APP for respondent - State -- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : MARCH 01, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2] Issue notice to the respondent - State. Learned A.P.P. waives notice.

3] By this application, the applicants/appellants - original accused are praying for suspension of

the substantive sentences awarded by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Beed in Sesssions Case No.41 of 2013 for the offences punishable under Section 143, 147, 333 read with 149 of Indian Penal Code directing them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Section 333 read with 149 of the Act, and to pay fine amount.

4] Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the fine amount has already been deposited by the applicants.

5] Considering the fact that short term sentences are awarded against the present applicants, the substantive sentences of the present applicants, are hereby suspended, during pendency of the appeal.

6] The applicants/appellants be released on bail upon their executing P.R. bond in the sum of

Rs.20,000/- (Rs.Twenty Thousand) each and also upon furnishing surety each in the like amount, during pendency of the appeal. Humdast allowed. 7] The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.108 OF 2016 1] Udhav Kisanrao Tandle, 2] Deepak Panditrao Salve, 3] Mahesh Udhavrao Tandle, 4] Rahul Udhavrao Tandle, 5] Mangesh Udhavrao Tandle ..Appellants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent -- Mr.R.G.Hange, advocate for appellants Mr.R.B.Bagul, APP for respondent - State -- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : MARCH 01, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2] Admit.

Learned A.P.P. waives notice for respondent - State.

3] Printing of the paper book is dispensed with. suspension of sentence.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp