Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur v. Bhagwan Govindrao Suryawanshi And Another

*1* 910ca2211o17&4856o13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2211 OF 2017 IN FA/2978/2013 SUMAN NAGNATH JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Gaikwad Rajeev M. and Shri C.D.Biradar (Both Absent).

AGP for Respondent 1/ State : Shri Y.G.Gujrathi. Advocate for Respondent 2 : Shri S.B.Bhosale. Advocate for Respondent 3 : Shri A.P.Yenegure. ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4856 OF 2013 IN FA/2978/2013 MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. -VERSUSBHAGWAN GOVINDRAO SURYAWANSHI AND ANOTHER. ...

Shri S.B.Bhosale, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A.P.Yenegure, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri Y.G.Gujrathi, Advocate for Respondent No.2/ State. ...

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE :- 17th November, 2017 Per Court :

(a) Civil Application No.2211/2017:-

*2* 910ca2211o17&4856o13 Since none appeared for the Applicant despite the appearances of two advocates on 28.09.2017 and 09.11.2017, this matter was posted for dismissal today. The matter is accordingly, shown on the daily board.

Since none appears for the Applicant, this Civil Application No.2211/2017 is rejected for want of prosecution. (b) Civil Application No.4856/2013:- We have considered the submissions of the learned Advocate for the Applicant.

Since the order dated 11.11.2013 has been complied with and the amount has been deposited, the interim relief granted would continue till the disposal of the First Appeal. Civil Application No.4856/2013 is accordingly, allowed. kps (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)