Ramdas Bhimrao Chandol v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 WP - 2268-2014+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2268 OF 2014 RAMDAS BHIMRAO CHANDOL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2271 OF 2014 GAJANAN KASHINATH KOLI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2272 OF 2014 SANJAY PRALHAD SONWANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2284 OF 2014 SANTOSH TUKARAM BHOLANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. A.S. Bayas, Advocate for petitioners in all writ petitions Mr. Y.G. Gujrathi, AGP for respondent-State Mr. P.S. Patil, Advocate for respondent no. 2 (WP/2284/2014) Mr. K.D. Bade Patil, Advocate for respondent no. 2 in WP/2268/2014, WP/2271/2014, WP/2272/2014 Mr. V.C. Patil, Advocate h/f. Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents no. 3 to 7 in WP/2271/2014, WP/2272/2014, WP/2284/2014 ...

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 11-12-2018

2 WP - 2268-2014+ ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that their tribe claims are pending with respondent no.2 - the scheduled tribe caste certificate scrutiny committee and the same are not decided yet.

3.

In the circumstances, it would be expedient that respondent no.2 decides on the tribe claims of petitioners, if not already decided, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of writ of this court. 4.

Petitioners to remain present before respondent no. 2 - the scheduled tribe caste certificate scrutiny committee on 27-12-2018 and shall abide by schedule of the committee and shall co-operate with it.

5.

Till disposal of tribe claims of petitioners by respondent no.2, no coercive action based on impugned communications dated 18/24-02-2014 be taken.

6.

Writ petitions are disposed of accordingly.

[S.M. GAVHANE] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE arp/