← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2617/2023admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Fakira Namdeo Jaiwal v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Slao.J.P.1, Aurangabad And ANR

2024-06-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:12067 ( 1 ) ca2613.23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 28 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2613 OF 2023 IN FAST/6366/2023 CHHABABAI GAJANAN JAIWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SLAO.J.P.1, AURANGABAD AND ANR AND 29 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2614 OF 2023 IN FAST/6373/2023 KISAN PARBAT KHARAT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SLAO,JP.1,AURANGABAD AND ANR AND 30 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2615 OF 2023 IN FAST/6370/2023 ARJUN KONDIBA JAIWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, J.P-1, AURANGABAD AND 31 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2616 OF 2023 IN FAST/6360/2023 UTTAM KONDIBA JAIWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SLAO.J.P.1, AURANGABAD AND ANR AND 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2617 OF 2023 IN FAST/6363/2023 FAKIRA NAMDEO JAIWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SLAO.J.P.1, AURANGABAD AND ANR AND 33 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2618 OF 2023 IN FAST/6356/2023 VITHAL NAMDEO JAIWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SLAO.J.P.1, AURANGABAD AND ANR AND 34 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2657 OF 2023 IN FAST/6688/2023 BHAGWAN ASHOK JAIWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH S.P.L.A.O., J.P.1, AURANGABAD AND ANR

( 2 ) ca2613.23 Mr.T.C. Sonawane and Mr. D.A. Bide, Advocates for the applicants. Mr.A.M. Phule, AGP for respondent/State in CA/2613/23. Mr.G.O. Wattamwar, AGP for respondent/State in CA/2614/23. Ms.M.N. Ghanekar, AGP for respondent/State in CA/2615/23. Mr.S.K. Shirse, AGP for respondent/State in CA/2616/23 Mr.V.M. Chate, AGP for respondent/State in CA/2617/23. Ms.M.L.Sangit, AGP for respondent/State in CA/2618/23. Ms.A.S. Mantri, AGP for respondent/State in CA/2657/23.

CORAM

: KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATED : 25.06.2024 PC :- 01.

These applications are filed for condonation of delay caused in filing the appeals by the claimants for enhancement in the amount of compensation.

02.

For the reasons stated in the applications and since the applicants are claimants, whose lands are acquired by the Government, this Court is inclined to allow the applications.

03.

Therefore, the applications are allowed. The delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. It is made clear that the applicants will not be entitled to claim interest on the enhanced amount for the delayed period. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2024/JUNE24/ca2613.23