← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2912/2019disposed offdismissed for default

M/S Radico Nv Distilleries Maharashtra Ltd Through Authorized Signatory v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-03-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

{1} wp2912.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2912 OF 2019 M/s Radico NV Distilleries Maharashtra Ltd.

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. Madhav Ghode, advocate holding for Mr. P.K. Joshi, advocate for petitioner.

Mrs. G.L. Deshpande, AGP for all respondents CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE : 26th March, 2019.

P.C. :

Petitioner, holding licence for manufacture of spirit and portable liquor, claims that pursuant to the policy of the Government, excess fees of Rs. 8,33,814/- paid by him for renewal of the licence for the year 2017-2018, needs to be adjusted. He has invited our attention to the Communication dated 19.04.2018 issued by the Joint Commissioner, State Excise, Aurangabad and also, recommendation given by the Superintendent, State Excise, Aurangabad.

2.

Learned AGP submits that the amount once paid is based on the temporary assessment of the production of the said year and as such, there is no need to adjust the amount once paid to the department.

3.

Having considered the rival submissions, in similar set of

{2} wp2912.19.odt situation, the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat in Writ Petition No. 1544/2018 vide order dated 16.03.2018, has directed the respondent-authorities to consider and decide the representation for refund of excess licence renewal fees paid. 4.

In the aforesaid backdrop, it will be appropriate in our opinion, to direct respondent-authorities to take decision on the representation dated 16.08.2018 preferred by the petitioner seeking refund/adjustment of excess licence fees, as expeditiously as possible, in any case, not less than three months from the date of communication of the order.

5.

With above directions, writ petition stands disposed of. NITIN W. SAMBRE PRASANNA B. VARALE JUDGE JUDGE dyb