Sandhyarani Devidas Perke v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:3680-DB *1* 918wp4582o21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4582 OF 2021 SANDHYARANI DEVIDAS PERKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Shri Jadhavar Pratap V., Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Amar V. Lavte, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4/State. ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.

DATE : 07th February, 2025 Per Court :- Heard.

2.

The petitioner is questioning the judgment and order of respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee, dated 14.02.2021, refusing to validate her 'Mannervarlu', Scheduled Tribe certificate.

2.

The impugned order is common order in the matters of several individuals including the petitioner. In different writ petitions, the impugned order has been already quashed and set aside to the extent of other individuals Anmol Jayprakash Perke (Writ Petition No.4343/2021 decided on 10.10.2023), Gaurav

*2* 918wp4582o21 Ratnakar Perke (Writ Petition No.4825/2021 decided on 10.10.2023), Apurva Ratnakar Perke (Writ Petition No.4910/2021 decided on 10.10.2023), Balasaheb Narayan Perke (Writ Petition No.4342/2021 decided on 28.11.2024), Yogesh Ramesh Perke (Writ Petition No.4344/2021 decided on 28.11.2024) and Shailaja Jaywantrao Perke (Writ Petition No.4336/2021 decided on 28.11.2024).

3.

No different view is possible to be taken in the present matter.

4.

For the reasons recorded in the matters of aforementioned individuals in their respective orders passed by this Court, even the impugned judgment and order is quashed and set aside to the extent of the present petitioner as well. The Writ Petition is allowed. Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee shall immediately issue a certificate of validity to the petitioner of 'Mannervarlu', Scheduled Tribe, which shall be co-terminus with the validities which the Committee has decided to reopen. kps ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)