Pandu Gyanoba Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp2303.14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2303 OF 2014 Pandu s/o Gyanoba Kamble Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. S.N. Lele Yelwatkar, advocate for petitioner. Mr.A.V.Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.M.G.Kasturkar, advocate for Respondent No.4. Mrs.M.A.Kulkarni, advocate holding for Mr.A.M.Kulkarni, advocate for Respondents No.5 to 14.

===== CORAM : S.B.SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2017 PER COURT:

1.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned AGP for respondents 1 and 2 and learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 to 14.

2.

The term of the Gram Panchayat is now over and, therefore, the challenge raised in this petition does not survive. Petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

S.B.SHUKRE JUDGE dyb