Mohan Kishan Wagalgave And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principle Secretary And Others

3519.24wp etc (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 16 WRIT PETITION NO. 3519 OF 2024 MUSTAFA FATTUSAB SHAIKH

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 18 WRIT PETITION NO. 3521 OF 2024 CHHAYA NARSING PURI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 19 WRIT PETITION NO. 3522 OF 2024 MOHAN KISHAN WAGALGAVE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 36 WRIT PETITION NO. 3564 OF 2024 PRALHAD BABURAO SURYAWANSHI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY AND OTHERS ....

Mr V. D. Gunale, Advocate h/f Mr S. G. Rudrawar, Advocate for Petitioners;

Mr A. B. Girase, G.P. a/w Mr S. K. Tambe, Mr A.A.A. Khan, A.G.Ps. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2/State in respective Petitions Mr P. R. Tandale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in all the Petitions

3519.24wp etc (2) CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND R. M. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 8th April, 2024 PER COURT:

1.

Considering the short issue involved in all these Writ Petitions, we requested the learned Advocate Shri. Tandale to represent the Respondent/Zilla Parishad, Latur. He submits that, this Court may grant a particular timeline within which, representations of all these Petitioners would be decided strictly in accordance with the law and the policies, and if it is practicable, feasible, and if there are vacancies available. 2.

Considering the above statement, let the representations of all these Petitioners be decided by the Respondent/Zilla Parishad, Latur, on or before 31/05/2024. 3.

With the above direction, all these Writ Petitions are disposed off.

(R. M. JOSHI, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk