Sunil Balkrushna Jagdale v. Mangesh S/O Vitthal Gaikwad And ANR

{1} 950-CA-8313-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8313 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 6366 OF 2022 SUNIL BALKRUSHNA JAGDALE

VERSUS

MANGESH S/O VITTHAL GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D.R. Markad Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S.R. Bodade ....

CORAM : S.G. DIGE, J.

DATE : 23rd August, 2022 ORDER :

.

Heard learned Counsel for applicant and learned Counsel for respondent No.2.

2.

Considering the submissions of both learned Counsel and reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed. The delay of 889 days for fling appeal is condoned.

3.

The applicant shall not claim any interest and statutory benefts for the delayed period and shall fle Pooja K.

{2} 950-CA-8313-2022 undertaking in that regard.

4.

Appeal be registered subject to removal of ofce objections, if any.

5.

Civil application is disposed of.

[S.G. DIGE, J.] Pooja K.