Archana Pandit Tayade v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp259516.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2595 OF 2016 Archana d/o Pandit Tayade Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. C. T. Jadhav, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M. M. Nerlikar, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. A. A. Jagatkar, advocate for Respondents No.2 to 4. Mr.V.S.Undre, advocate for Respondent No.5 CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J. & S.S. SHINDE, J.

DATE : 27th August, 2021.

PC :

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that a fresh recruitment process has been initiated and that the petitioner may be granted liberty to amend the writ petition. Since the subject matter of the writ petition is the recruitment process of 2015 and appointments made in pursuance of such process were contractual and have come to an end, we fnd no reason to grant the prayer of the petitioner for amendment of the writ petition.

{2} wp259516.odt The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

This order shall not preclude the petitioner to participate in any fresh recruitment process subject, of course, to fulfllment of the eligibility criteria.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE adb