Nihalsing Shivlal Gusinge v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10369 OF 2021 IN FAST/9684/2021 DILIPSING ASARAM GUSINGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND 909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10370 OF 2021 IN FAST/9794/2021 KAMALBAI GANESH GUSINGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND 910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10373 OF 2021 IN FAST/7166/2021 MADAN MOHAN GUSINGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10374 OF 2021 IN FAST/7170/2021 NIHALSING SHIVLAL GUSINGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10375 OF 2021 IN FAST/9476/2021 SUPPADSING SHIVLAL GUSINGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10377 OF 2021 IN FAST/9460/2021
SHIVSING HIRAMAN NAGLOT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
AND 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10379 OF 2021 IN FAST/8410/2021 PRATAPSINGH ASARAM GUSINGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D.M. Pingale AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. S. R.
Yadav - Lonikar Mr. P. N. Kutti, Mr. A. A. Jagatkar Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr.S. G. Bhalerao ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED : 23/09/2022.
....
PER COURT. :
The learned counsel Mr.S. G. Bhalerao waives notice for respondent No. 3 - Acquiring Body.
2.
Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in the applications which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP and learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 -Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.
3.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the respective delay periods as mentioned in the applications are hereby condoned subject to condition that the concerned applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods. 4.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
5.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ) JUDGE shp/-