← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3592/2019delay condonatedrejected

Uddhav Pralhadrao Barsole v. Suryakant Baburao Kamble And ORS

2021-02-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. G. Sewlikar1 pages

( 1 ) 904 ca 3592.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3592 OF 2019 IN FAST/6721/2019 WITH CA/3593/2019 IN FAST/6721/2019 UDDHAV PRALHADRAO BARSOLE

VERSUS

SURYAKANT BABURAO KAMBLE AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shirsat Suhas R. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Hemant Jaju h/f. S.S. Rathi Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Hawale h/f. Y.K. Bobade ...

CORAM : M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.

DATE : 10.02.2021 P.C.:- Heard Shri Shirsat learned counsel for the applicant / owner, learned counsel for the respondent no.6-insurance company and Shri Hawale h/f. Shri Bobade for respondent nos.1 to 4. None present for respondent no.5. 2.

In para 3 of the application, the applicant has alleged that he was not aware of the passing of the award by the learned Tribunal. Shri Shirsat has stated that he has deposited 50% of the amount of compensation. For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Respondents can be compensated with cost. In view of this, delay of 297 days is condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the claimant. If the cost is not deposited within two months the application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. [M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.] mub