Union Of India Thr General Manager, C.R. Mumbai And ORS v. Digambar S/O Tatyaba Murumkar

(1) 955 CA-5544.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 955 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.

5544 OF 2022 IN FAST/6664/2022 WITH CA/5545/2022 IN FAST/6664/2022 WITH CA/5606/2022 IN FAST/6830/2022 WITH CA/5609/2022 IN FAST/6839/2022 WITH CA/5605/2022 IN FAST/6810/2022 WITH CA/5608/2022 IN FAST/6830/2022 WITH CA/5610/2022 IN FAST/6839/2022 WITH CA/5551/2022 IN FAST/6855/2022 WITH CA/5550/2022 IN FAST/6850/2022 WITH CA/5604/2022 IN FAST/6810/2022 WITH CA/5602/2022 IN FAST/6803/2022 WITH CA/5567/2022 IN FAST/6817/2022 WITH CA/5596/2022 IN FAST/6880/2022 WITH CA/5555/2022 IN FAST/6790/2022 WITH CA/5571/2022 IN FAST/6863/2022 WITH CA/5587/2022 IN FAST/6869/2022 WITH CA/5590/2022 IN FAST/6887/2022 WITH CA/5572/2022 IN FAST/6863/2022 WITH CA/5594/2022 IN FAST/6873/2022 WITH CA/5598/2022 IN FAST/6780/2022 WITH CA/5570/2022 IN FAST/6860/2022 WITH CA/5593/2022 IN FAST/6873/2022 WITH CA/5564/2022 IN FAST/6822/2022 WITH CA/5558/2022 IN FAST/6785/2022 WITH CA/5563/2022 IN FAST/6825/2022 WITH CA/5552/2022 IN FAST/6855/2022 WITH CA/5556/2022 IN FAST/6790/2022 WITH CA/5597/2022 IN FAST/6780/2022 WITH CA/5601/2022 IN FAST/6803/2022 WITH CA/5562/2022 IN FAST/6825/2022 WITH CA/5600/2022 IN FAST/6794/2022 WITH CA/5568/2022 IN FAST/6817/2022 WITH CA/5586/2022 IN FAST/6866/2022 WITH CA/5588/2022 IN FAST/6869/2022 WITH CA/5592/2022 IN FAST/6887/2022 WITH CA/5557/2022 IN FAST/6785/2022 WITH CA/5569/2022 IN FAST/6860/2022 WITH CA/5548/2022 IN FAST/6846/2022 WITH CA/5554/2022 IN FAST/6813/2022 WITH CA/5565/2022 IN FAST/6822/2022 WITH CA/5547/2022 IN FAST/6846/2022 WITH CA/5549/2022 IN FAST/6850/2022 WITH CA/5595/2022 IN FAST/6880/2022 WITH CA/5585/2022 IN FAST/6866/2022 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER, C.

R.

MUMBAI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

DIGAMBAR S/O TATYABA MURUMKAR ...

(2) 955 CA-5544.2022.odt Mr. S.B. Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. G.R. Jagtap, Advocate for the respondents. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

16.11.2022.

ORDER IN DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATIONS:- .

Heard rival submissions. The applicant appellant is seeking condonation of delay of 753 days in all these applications which appears to be caused due to obtaining sanction from higher authority. There is no strong objection from the other side. As such, the delay of 753 days in all these applications stands condoned. The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any. The applications are disposed of accordingly.

ORDER IN STAY APPLICATIONS :- The learned Counsel for the applicant - appellant submits that the administrative sanction has already obtained and only the cheques of the compensation amounts in all these matters are to be deposited and the same will be deposited within two weeks. As such, time to deposit the compensation amount is hereby extended by period of three weeks, as a last chance.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde