Raosaheb Yadav Auti v. The Chief Executive Officer Zp Ahmednagar
2025:BHC-AUG:34740-DB 1 57-WP-3383-17(R).odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3383 OF 2017 SUNITA NANASAHEB THORAT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. S. S. Wagh, Advocate h/f Mr. Vithal H. Dighe, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent/State Ms. Vijaya Bharkad, Advocate h/f Ms. Manjushri V. Narwade, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 And 3 ...
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 3541 OF 2017 VIDYA KISANRAO RAUT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. S. S. Wagh, Advocate h/f Mr. Vithal H. Dighe, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. Avinash D. Aghav, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ...
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 3263 OF 2017 RAOSAHEB YADAV AUTI
VERSUS
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AHMEDNAGAR ...
Mr. P. B. Shirsath and Mr. A. S. Khedkar, Advocates for Petitioner Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. Avinash D. Aghav, Advocate for Respondent ...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 08th DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT :
1.
In all these petitions, petitioners are challenging the SVH
2 57-WP-3383-17(R).odt respective final show-cause notices issued to them by the Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zilla Parishad. In March, 2017 this Court issued notices to the respondents and protected services of the petitioners observing that, 'till the next date adverse action may not be taken against petitioners pursuant to the impugned notices'. Almost nine years period is lapsed since the date of above order. 2.
During pendency of these writ petitions, the petitioners retired on superannuation.
3.
In view of subsequent development, we quash and set aside the impugned show-cause notices and action pursuant thereto. Respondents are directed to extend all the retiral consequential pecuniary benefits to the petitioners within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 4.
With these directions the writ petitions are disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH