← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/8296/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Ex. Engineer, Irrigation Div. Osmanabad Thr Ex. Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Pro. Div. Osmanabad v. Tanaji Irappa Langade And ANR

2019-11-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

26 CA 8296 18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 26 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NO. 8296 OF 2018 IN FAST/7070/2018 EX. ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIV. OSMANABAD, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OSMANABAD MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION

VERSUS

TANAJI IRAPPA LANDAGE AND ANR.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sangle Shirish G. Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. L.C. Pati. A.G.P. for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. S.P. Deshmukh. CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 13/11/2019 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides.

2.

There is a delay of 1392 days in preferring the appeal by the Acquiring Body challenging the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court under the Land Acquisition Act. 3.

The learned advocate for the respondent No. 1/original claimant opposes the application.

4.

Since the award would carry interest at an alarming rate, the Acquiring Body was not to gain anything by allowing the appeal to be lapsed by time.

1/2

26 CA 8296 18.odt 5.

Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, in the absence of any other ground to infer that the delay has been occasioned malafidely, it deserves to be condoned. 6.

The Civil Application is allowed. The delay is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) to the respondent No. 1/Claimant within a period of six weeks. ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) mkd 2/2