← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/209/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Jyoti Kishor Pardeshi v. Nandkumar And Others

2018-08-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 120 CONT. PETITION NO. 209 OF 2018 IN WP/6420/2016 JYOTI KISHOR PARDESHI

VERSUS

NANDKUMAR AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Dighe Vithal H.

Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Shelke Shivaji T. ---- CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 6, 2018 O R D E R :

The learned counsel for respondents submits that the order of this court is complied.

2.

The proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioner is rejected.

Mr.

Dighe, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without application of mind the proposal has been rejected.

3.

The merits of the order would not be a subject matter of the Contempt Petition. If petitioner is aggrieved with the order passed, the petitioner has remedy available.

cp209.18 4.

As the order is complied, the contempt stands purged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. No costs. [SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.] mahajansb/