Ginyandeo Chapla Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(1) 909 CA-9601.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9601 OF 2022 IN FAST/7496/2021 GINYANDEO CHAPLA RATHOD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. D.R. Jaybhar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. of respondent No.1 - State. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

20th April 2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 2861 days, which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition. The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. The Acquiring Body though served, but remained absent. 3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 2861 days in this application stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay.

(2) 909 CA-9601.2022.odt 4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde