Nagnath Malikarjun Vaze v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

(Order) (1) C.A. No. 6278 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6278 OF 2013 IN FAST/7391/2013 NAGNATH MALIKARJUN VAZE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .........

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B.R. Sontakke Patil AGP for Respondent no.01 : Mr. A.M. Phule Advocate for Respondent no.02 : Mr. Krishna K. Kulkarni .........

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 30TH JULY 2019 ORAL ORDER :

01.

Present application has been filed by the claimant for getting delay of 501 days condoned in filing first appeal. The claimant intends to challenge the judgment and award passed by the reference Court for enhancement.

02.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader representing respondent no.01 strongly opposes the application on the ground that the reason that has been mentioned for condonation of delay is not sufficient and reasonable.

03.

Taking into consideration the fact that the

(Order) (2) C.A. No. 6278 of 2013 applicant is agriculturist, coming from rural area and whose land was acquired; leniency is required to be shown and hence the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed and disposed of. It is clarified that the applicant is not entitled to get interest of 501 days in case of success in his appeal. Registry to verify and register the first appeal and place it for further consideration on 15th November 2019.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) JUDGE ...........

puranik / CA6278.13