Laxmibai Dhondiba Ullewar v. The Additional Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 WRIT PETITION NO.3299 OF 2017 LAXMIBAI DHONDIBA ULLEWAR AGP for Respondents 1-3 : Mr. S P Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent 5 : Mr. Phatale Sagar S 903 WRIT PETITION NO.15280 OF 2019 VARSHARANI RAJESH BAJGIRE THE COLLECTOR, NANDED AND OTHERS Advocate for Respondent 8 : Mr. Dhage Vaibhav B. 919 WRIT PETITION NO.2307 OF 2021 JAYASHRI DHANAJI CHANDAWAR AND ANOTHER Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Deshmukh Umakant B 932 WRIT PETITION NO.1620 OF 2017 SUMANBAI TRIMBAKRAO PACHLINGE

AGP for Respondents: Mr.S B Pulkundwar Advocate for Respondent 4 : Mr. Patale Amol N 935 WRIT PETITION NO.12593 OF 2017 SHANKAR GANESHRAO MUNDE 936 WRIT PETITION NO.12598 OF 2017 SHANKAR GANESHRAO MUNDE 937 WRIT PETITION NO.12694 OF 2017 LAXMIBAI MOTIRAM KONKE THE COLLECTOR NANDED AND OTHERS

938 WRIT PETITION NO.14501 OF 2017 SHANKAR GANESHRAO MUNDE 941 WRIT PETITION NO.2239 OF 2019 MADHAV GOVIND DEVKATTE THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS 942 WRIT PETITION NO.3150 OF 2019 SHANKAR VITTHAL RAKHE THE COLLECTOR NANDED AND OTHERS AGP for Respondents: Mr. Mr. S B Pulkundwar 943 WRIT PETITION NO.3155 OF 2019 MAHAJAN BHUJANGA UMARE THE COLLECTOR NANDED AND OTHERS AGP for Respondents : Mr. S B Pulkundwar

944 WRIT PETITION NO.3689 OF 2019 MADHAV GOVIND DEVKATTE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AGP for Respondents: Mr. R D Sanap 945 WRIT PETITION NO.4548 OF 2019 BALAJI KESHAVRAO JAGTAP AND ANOTHER ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Deshmukh Umakant B 947 WRIT PETITION NO.11209 OF 2019 VASANT RAOSAHEB KALYANKAR AURANGABAD DIVISION AND OTHERS WITH WP NO.11220 OF 2019 VISHWANATH KONDIBA AKEMWAD THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, AURANGABAD DIVISION AND OTHERS.

AGP for Respondents : Mr.S B Pulkundwar

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated : February 04, 2021 PER COURT :- 1.

These are the writ petitions challenging the disqualifcation. Some of the writ petitions pertains to disqualifcation of the petitioner/Member of the Grampanchayat and in some of the matters the petitions have preferred on other grounds. However, in all the writ petition/s the term of the petitioner/Member of the Grampanchayat is over. In view of the same, all these writ petitions are disposed off as infructuous. ( V.K. JADHAV, J. )