Manohar Ramchandra Kale v. Jitendra Tukaram Jadhav

c.a.4216.08

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4216 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1282 OF 2008 Manohar Ramchandra Kale ...APPLICANT versus Jitendra Tukaram Jadhav ...RESPONDENT .....

Mr. B.D. Lone, Advocate for applicant.

.....

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 4th DECEMBER, 2015 Order :-

1. Learned counsel for applicant refers to that for quite sometime respondent could not be served though various applications were required to be made for effecting service. He further informs that respondent has been now duly served with notice of delay condonation application.

2.

Despite service, none appears on behalf of respondent. 3.

Taking into account the reasons contained in civil application, I deem it appropriate to condone the delay, which is of only two days. Accordingly, delay is condoned.

4.

Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and "C" and stands disposed of.

Sd/- ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. ) MTK