Pallavi Chetan Swami v. Chetan Chandrashekhar Swami And ORS

905-ca-3420-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3420 OF 2022 IN MCA/291/2021 PALLAVI CHETAN SWAMI

VERSUS

CHETAN CHANDRASHEKHAR SWAMI AND OTHERS ....

Mr. Jayant R. Patil, Advocate for the Applicants ....

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 20 JULY 2022 PER COURT:- By this petition, the petitioner is seeking transfer of a divorce proceeding initiated by the respondent No.1 and the suit filed by the respondent No.2 father-in-law.

The father-in-law has been served, but the husband could not be.

3.

The learned advocate Mr. Patil for the applicant submits that the respondent No.1 was attempted to be serve on his registered address given in the lower court proceedings, but it is now being reported that he has migrated to Germany. The applicant is unaware about his address in Germany. In spite of the

905-ca-3420-22 father having put an appearance through an advocate, the applicant is unable to proceed with the application for want of service to the respondent/husband. She has therefore prayed for substituted service.

4.

Taking into account the reasons as mentioned above, issue notice to respondent No.1, returnable on 19-08-2022 for effecting service under Order V Rule 20 and/or also under Order V Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

5.

The civil application is disposed of.

[ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE S.P. Rane