Shriram Garbad Mahajan And ORS v. Janardhan Eknath Pawar And ANR

cran936.05 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 936 OF 2005 SHRIRAM GARBAD MAHAJAN & ORS

VERSUS

JANARDHAN EKNATH PAWAR & ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Swapnil S Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. P.P. Dhorde APP for Respondent No.2: Mr. A.R. Kale .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2016 PER COURT:- 1.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1-original complainant submits that during pendency of this criminal application, in the year 2013, respondent No.1 died. In view of above, cause for filing present criminal application has been rendered infructuous. The criminal application is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. Rule discharged.

2.

The applicants are at liberty to file application under the provisions of Section 256 of Cr.P.C. before the trial court. The points raised in this criminal application are also kept open and the applicants are at liberty to raise those points, if such occasion arises, before the trial court.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/