Bombay High CourtWP/2508/2014disposed offdismissed for default
Subhash Tatyarao Pathrikar, Aurangabad v. The State Of Maharashtra
2018-12-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane1 pages
WP-2508-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2508 OF 2014 Shri Subhash Tatyarao Pathrikar .. Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondents -- Mr G. J. Dahad, Advocate for petitioner Mr P. M. Kulkarni, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent-State CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ DATE : 5th December, 2018 ORDER :
1.
With the passage of time and in view of subsequent events taking place, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the matter has been rendered inefficacious and submits that it be disposed of as such.
2.
Writ petition, thus, is disposed of as inefficacious. S. M. GAVHANE SUNIL P. DESHMUKH JUDGE JUDGE pnd/-