← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3754/2017admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Ramesh Eknath Lipane And ORS v. Ramnath Vithoba Lipane And ORS

2024-09-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

(1) 918- CA-3754-2017.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3754 OF 2017 IN SA/634/2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1447 OF 2021 IN SA/220/2017 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12603 OF 2016 IN SA/634/2016 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3751 OF 2017 IN SA/220/2017 CA 3754/2017 RAMESH EKNATH LIPANE AND ORS

VERSUS

RAMNATH VITHOBA LIPANE AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.S. Wagh h/f Mr. S.T. Shelke Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A. P. Bhandari ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : September 10, 2024 ORDER:- IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3754/2017 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicants/appellants are seeking permission to bring on record legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 Ramnath Vithoba Lipane, who admittedly died on 12.11.2016, by condoning the delay of 25 days. Though the

(2) 918- CA-3754-2017.odt application is opposed, but considering the right to sue, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (A), subject to cost of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) to be paid to the Library, Advocates Association of High Court, Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad.

3.

Amendment be carried out within stipulated period, after deposit of cost.

4.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1447 of 2021 5.

Heard.

6.

Issue notice to the proposed legal representatives of deceased respondent No.3, returnable on 24.09.2024. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni