Gajanan Prakash Baviskar v. Sangita Dnyandeep Chaudhary And ORS

35 ca.3475.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

35 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3475 OF 2022 IN FAST/22626/2019 GAJANAN PRAKASH BAVISKAR

VERSUS

SANGITA DNYANDEEP CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. K. M. Daskhedkar, h/f Mrs. Surekha P. Mahajan. ...

CORAM :

SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE :

14th March, 2022.

P.C.:

.

Heard Ms. Daskhedkar, holding for Mrs. S. P. Mahajan, learned counsel for applicant.

Respondent No.5 could not be served despite of best efforts. The learned counsel for applicant seeks substituted service against respondent No.5 by paper publication. The prayer needs to be allowed. Hence, the following order is passed:

O R D E R

I.

The application is hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

II.

The learned counsel for applicant to submit copy of paper publication alongwith affidavit in order to show substituted service against respondent No.5.

35 ca.3475.22.odt III.

The civil application is accordingly disposed of. [ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. ] nga