Minakshi Mohaniraj Kshirsagar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} 905 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11615 OF 2022 IN FCAST/1783/2022 MEENAKSHI W/O BHAGWAN BHANDARGE

VERSUS

BHAGWAN S/O VILAS BHANDARGE ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Panale Sachin S. Adv. for Respondents: Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde.

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATE : 26th APRIL, 2023 P.C.:- Counsel for non-applicant has opposed the prayer, as according to him, the applicant was not diligent in pursuing the proceedings. However, having regard to the cause disclosed in the petition, delay of 98 days stands condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be deposited with the High Court Bar Library, within three weeks from today. In case, if the cost is not deposited, the application shall stand dismissed without reference to the court. Statement made by counsel for applicant that the office objections shall be removed within a period of two weeks is also accepted as an undertaking to his court. In case of failure to remove office objections within two weeks, the matter shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to the court. [S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR] [NITIN W. SAMBRE] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-