Mahajabeen Fatema Abdul Rahman@Mahajabeen Fatema Sk. Abdul Hafeez v. Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust, Aurangabad And Others

WP2149.2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2149 OF 2013 Smt. Mahajabeen Fatema D/o Abdul Rahman @ Smt. Mahajabeen Fatema W/o Prof. Dr. Sk. Abdul Hafeez ..

Petitioner

Versus

Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust, Aurangabad and others ..

Respondents ---------------- Mr Ajay S. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner Mr S. S. Kazi, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr Gundre, Advocate for respondent No. 2 ---------------- ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2149 OF 2013 CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : JANUARY12TH, 2015.

PER COURT:

1.

After hearing submissions at bar, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 - Trust, conceded that the enquiry Committee could not have been convened by respondent No. 2, against whom serious allegations were made by the petitioner before commencement of the enquiry. Mr Kazi stated that

WP2149.2013 respondent No. 1 - Society would reconstitute the Committee in which members would not have bias against the petitioner. Mr Kazi also informed that Mr L. G. Kale has left the Committee and he is replaced by one Mr Shah Hasan Razzaq, who is an awardee teacher.

2.

In view of the statement made by Mr Kazi, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 - Trust, the petitioner's grievance is almost mitigated. The enquiry against the petitioner shall start de novo and petitioner should cooperate with the same.

3.

Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 4.

In view of disposal of writ petition, connected Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of.

[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] [ A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ] sgp