Avinash Tulshiram Kate v. State Of Maha And ANR

(1) WP No.4648/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 4648 OF 2004 Avinash Tulshiram Kate Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents.

*** Mr. Prasanna Dadpe, Advocate holding for Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. M.A. Deshpande, Addl. G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr. P.S. Dighe, Advocate for respondent No.4. *** WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4715 OF 2004 Suraj Sunil Kabra Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents.

*** Mr. A.B. Kale, Advocate for the petitioner.

Smt. M.A. Deshpande, Addl. G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr. P.S. Dighe, Advocate for respondent No.4. ***

(2) WP No.4648/2004 CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

Dated : 03-11-2017.

PER COURT :- 1.

Learned Advocates for the petitioner in both the Petitions submit that considering the interim relief granted by this Court and in view of the petitioners having progressed in their educational curriculum, both these Petitions are rendered infructuous.

2.

Learned A.G.P. for the State has no objection for the disposal of these Petitions.

3.

In the light of the above, both Petitions are disposed of as being infructuous. Rule is discharged. ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE) JUDGE JUDGE vdd/