Bhagwat Chandranath Bedade And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} 930 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 WRIT PETITION NO. 2820 OF 2018 BHAGWAT CHANDRANATH BEDADE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. G.J. Karne AGP for Respondents: Mr. P.N. Kutti CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 15th March, 2018.

PER COURT:- 1.

Prima facie, there does not appear to be occurrence of any cause of action for presenting the petition. The petitioners are objecting to the so called report of the Assistant Commissioner, Backward Class Cell, Aurangabad dated 7th June, 2017, demonstrating the available reserved vacancies and the report dated 16th February, 2018 recording similar particulars.

2.

The petitioners are not in a position to demonstrate as to how they are affected. The petitioners have not produced the letters of appointment though they are making grievance that they are being compelled to produce the validation certificate though their appointments are from open category. The petitioners are not in a position to substantiate their contentions.

3.

Petitioners contend that they are desirous of securing transfer

{2} 930 sr.no..odt to Latur District. However, as a result of subsequent development concerning fixation of Roster Points, there are impediments in securing such transfers. It must be noted that to secure inter-District transfer is not a right of an employee, neither legal nor constitutional. No relief in that regard can be claimed in exercise of extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition being sans merit, same is dismissed. [K.K.SONAWANE, J] [R.M. BORDE, J] grt/-