Dipak Rohidas Sherkar v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

2919.15wp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 2919 OF 2015 DIPAK ROHIDAS SHERKAR

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Golewar V P AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.V.M. Kagne.

Advocate for Respondent 4 : Mr.R.N. Joshi h/f Mr.Bagul D.S.

...

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.

Dated: DECEMBER14, 2015 ...

Heard.

Upon perusal of the material placed on record and in particular, experience certificate, prima facie, it appears that the petitioner possesses seven years experience of work as electrician. However, in the impugned communication, the reason assigned is that, the petitioner has no seven years

2919.15wp experience of the relevant trade.

In that view of the matter, the impugned communication is quashed and set aside. We direct the respondent No.4 to reconsider the entire issue and once again scrutinize the documents possessed by the petitioner showing experience of concerned trade and take decision afresh, as expeditiously as possible; however, within eight weeks from today. Before taking such decision, we hope and expect that, the concerned authority will afford reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Original record produced by the Counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 be returned back forthwith. Petition stands disposed of, accordingly.

(P.R. BORA, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/