Raosaheb Panditrao Shastri v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

ca4513.16 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4513 OF 2016 IN FAST/7474/2016 WITH CA/4514/2016 IN FAST/7474/2016 RAOSAHEB PANDITRAO SHASTRI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Deshpande Siddharth R. AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S.R. Yadav Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 8: Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 17th JUNE, 2016 PER COURT:- 1.

As per office note, respondent No.9 has refused to accept the notice.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.P. for respondent No.1-State and learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to

8. For the reasons stated in the civil application for condonation of delay, the same is allowed. Delay condoned. Civil application for condonation of delay is disposed.

3.

Leave to add respondent No.9 as party in the first appeal. 4.

Notice to respondents in first appeal.

ca4513.16 -25.

Learned A.G.P. waives notice for respondent No.1 and Mr. Katneshwarkar, learned counsel, waives notice for respondent Nos. 2 to 8.

6.

Call for record and proceedings.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/