Suryakant Vitthalrao Mogal And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

51-CA-9379-2018 .odt (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 51 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9379 OF 2018 IN FAST/7219/2016 WITH CA/9374/2018 IN FAST/7524/2016 WITH CA/9375/2018 IN FAST/7522/2016 WITH CA/9376/2018 IN FAST/7508/2016 WITH CA/9377/2018 IN FAST/7528/2016 WITH CA/9378/2018 IN FAST/7516/2016 WITH CA/9380/2018 IN FAST/7514/2016 WITH CA/9381/2018 IN FAST/7506/2016 ASARAM ANNA MOGAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. U.M. Mhaske Patil h/f Mr. Naik K Kaustubh AGP for Respondents/State : Ms. S.S. Raut ...

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

DATED : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

PER COURT:- .

Heard Shri Mhaske holding for Shri Naik and Smt. Raut the learned AGP for State.

2.

The acquiring body though has been duly served, no one has entered appearance on its behalf.

For the reasons stated in the applications, which according to me are just and sufficient, the delay of 226 days occurred in filing the appeals is condoned. The appeals be registered in accordance with law. All Civil Applications are allowed and disposed of.

51-CA-9379-2018 .odt (2) 3.

After registration of the appeals, issue notice to respondent nos. 1 to 3, returnable on 16.10.2018. Smt. S.S. Raut, the learned AGP waives notice for respondent nos.1 and 2.

(P.R. BORA, J.) Mujaheed//