Vinayak Rajaram Patil v. State Of Maha And ORS

wp5392.02 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5392 OF 2002 WITH CA/3974/2004 IN WP/5392/2002 VINAYAK RAJARAM PATIL

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHA RASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. B. R. Warma AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. S.R. Palnitkar Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar Advocate for Respondents 6, 10, 21, 22 and 32: Mr. A.H. Kasliwal Advocate for Respondents 37 to 58: Mr. L.V. Sangit Advocate for respondent Nos. 4, 5, 7 to 9, 11 to 20, 23 to 31 and 33 to 36: Mr. Girish Rane .....

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 400 OF 2003 DEEPAK PRALHAD BHAVSAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .....

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A.H. Kasliwal AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. S.R. Palnitkar Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar .....

CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2015 P.C. :- 1.

Perused the contents of both the writ petitions. It appears that the grievances raised in these petitions are almost mitigated, as this Court by passing the interim order appointed a committee headed by

wp5392.02 -2the Sub Divisional Officer, Amalner. The said committee removed the encroachments from the public roads. In view of this subsequent development, the purpose for which the petitions are filed, has been served. If at all any further grievance remains there, the same can be addressed by filing fresh writ petition/s. In the light of above observations, both these writ petitions are disposed of. Rule discharged.

2.

Pending civil applications in these writ petition/s are also disposed of.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( A. V. NIRGUDE, J. ) rlj/