Kirti Hemchandra Patil v. Hemchandra Ravindranath Patil

2025:BHC-AUG:36155 ( 1 ) mca80.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2025 KIRTI HEMCHANDRA PATIL

VERSUS

HEMCHANDRA RAVINDRANATH PATIL Mr. B.R.Warma, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Sunil P. Koli, Advocate for the respondent.

CORAM

: KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 18.12.2025 PC :- 01.

Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned Advocate for the respondent. This application is at the instance of wife, seeking transfer of matrimonial proceeding pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Dhule bearing HMP No. 505 of 2024. It is case of the wife that there are two children staying with her at Dhule, who are aged 5 and 7 years. One criminal case is also pending in Dhule, where the husband will have to appear. She thus prays for allowing this application.

02.

Learned Advocate for the respondent vehemently opposes this application. He submits that there is old aged mother staying with the husband at Aurangabad. He finds it difficult to travel to Dhule. 03.

Considering that there are two children staying with wife at Dhule, it would be in the interest of justice to transfer the proceeding to the Court at Dhule.

( 2 ) mca80.25 04.

Considering the above, this application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). After transfer of the proceeding, the wife shall not seek unnecessary adjournment. If it is found that the adjournment is unnecessarily sought by the wife, the Trial Court may pass appropriate orders compensating the husband, if he personally remains present in the Court. If husband makes request for appearing through video conferencing, same shall be considered liberally by the Trial Court.

[KISHORE C. SANT,J.] snk/2025/Dec25/mca80.25