Kiran Ravindrasing Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 34-WP-3347.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3347 OF 2017 KIRAN RAVINDRASING PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS -- Mr.G.V.Wani, Advocate for petitioner Mr.M.A.Deshpande, AGP for respondent no.1 Mr.Y.B.Bolkar, Advocate for respondent no.2 -- CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 14, 2017 PER COURT :

Heard Mr.Wani, learned Counsel for the petitioner. He states that the validation proceedings in respect of the tribe claim of the petitioner is pending with respondent no.2 - Committee. The father of the petitioner has already been issued the validation certificate. The vigilance is already conducted, however, respondent nos.3 and 4 have withheld the result of the petitioner for the examination of third year of B.E. Course.

2 34-WP-3347.odt 2.

We have heard the learned AGP for respondent no.1 and learned Counsel for respondent no.2.

3.

To get the validation proceedings decided is not in the hands of a litigant. We, therefore, pass following order :- (i) As vigilance has already been conducted, respondent no.2 shall decide the validation proceedings as expeditiously as possible and preferably, within a period of four months from today. The petitioner shall appear before respondent no.2 - Committee on 30.03.2017.

(ii) Respondent nos.3 and 4 shall not withhold the result of the petitioner for the aforementioned examination and shall not refrain him from prosecuting further studies only on the ground that that validation proceedings are pending.

3 34-WP-3347.odt (iii) Respondent nos.3 and 4 can take further action depending upon the judgment that may be delivered in the validation proceedings. [SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] kbp