Vishal Vikram Itape v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3550 OF 2017 Vishal s/o Vikram Ithape Age: 23 years, Occ: Nil, R/o. Arangaon, Tq. Kaij & Dist. Beed.

..PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary Social Justice Department, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2.

The Commissioner, Social Welfare Directorate, Maharashtra State, Pune-1.

3.

The Divisional Deputy Commissioner, Social Welfar Department, Aurangabad.

4.

The Assistant Commissioner, Social Welfare, Beed.

5.

Shushilk Shikshan Sanstha, Beed.

Through the Secretary, Sushil Dinesh Pawar, Age: 40 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Bhagyadeep Niwas, Kranti Nagar, Behind Tahsil Office, Nagar Road, Beed.

6.

The Head Master, Madhyamik Ashramshala, Naiknagar, Georai, Tq. Georai & Dist. Beed...RESPONDENTS Mr A.D.Hande, Advocate for petitioner;

Mr A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4

(2) CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2017 ORAL ORDER :

The petitioner claims that his father was working with respondent Nos. 5 and 6 on the post of Superintendent. He died in harness on 11th May, 2016. The petitioner is seeking appointment on the compassionate basis in his place.

2.

It is stated that the petitioner's mother i.e. wife of the deceased filed an application requesting before respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to grant appointment to the petitioner being son of the deceased. The said application has not been considered and decided. In the circumstances, the petitioner approached this Court by this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3.

Having regard to the fact that the

(3) petitioner's application for grant of compassionate appointment has not been considered and decided, we dispose of the petition, by directing respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 to consider and take appropriate decision on the petitioner's application, as expeditiously as possible but not later than three months from the receipt of copy of this order. 4.

With above directions, writ petition stands disposed of.

(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) ( SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) Tupe