Sadeq Pashu Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 23 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.305 OF 2022 SADEQ PASHU SHAIKH

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Mr. S.K. Savangikar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. A.M. Phule, APP for the respondent ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE:

28th MARCH, 2022 PER COURT :

Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that he had sent letter to the applicant stating that since applicant is not cooperating with him, he will not appear for the applicant and he should engage some other person and he has also produced the track report stating that his letter has been received by the applicant, however, this applicant has not contacted him yet. Therefore, he submits that his appearance should be discharged. In view of the fact that the procedure has been completed he is discharged. Since this is an anticipatory bail application and it appears from

ABA_305_2022 the contents of the letter given by the learned Advocate for the applicant that the applicant is not interested in application. Under such circumstance, the application stands rejected for want of prosecution. ( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. ) agd