← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3817/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Satyabhamabai Tukaram Patil And ORS v. Executive Engineer, Vishnupuri Project Div. Nanded Now Lendi Project Div Degloor Under Gmidc And Or

2018-03-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh3 pages

{1} drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3795 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18514 OF 2016 Yosuf Ab. Khadar and Others APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Executive Engineer, Vishnupuri Project & Ors. RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Sunil V. Kurundkar, Advocate for the applicants Mrs. Ranjana Reddy, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for respondents No.2 and 3 .......

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3794 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18508 OF 2016 Shankarrao Mashnaji Yerewad (Died) and Ors.

APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Executive Engineer, Vishnupuri Project & Ors. RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Sunil V. Kurundkar, Advocate for the applicants Mrs. Ranjana Reddy, Advocate for respondents .......

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3861 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.17847 OF 2016 Rajaram Sambhaji Patil and Ors.

APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Executive Engineer, Vishnupuri Project & Ors. RESPONDENTS

{2} .......

Mr. Sunil V. Kurundkar, Advocate for the applicants Mr. B. R. Surwase, Advocate for respondents .......

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3817 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.5202 OF 2017 Satyabhamabai Tukaram Patil and Ors.

APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Executive Engineer, Vishnupuri Project & Ors. RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Sunil V. Kurundkar, Advocate for the applicants Mr. B. R. Surwase, Advocate for respondents .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 16 th MARCH, 2018 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocates for the parties concur on that subject matter involved in the first appeals is similar to the one involved in first appeal stamp No.17956 of 2016 and companion matters. It is further being referred to that in similar set of circumstances involved in present applications, applications for withdrawal filed by the claimants in those first appeals have been allowed under order dated 7th December, 2017. Learned advocate for the respondents fairly concede to that the applications may receive

{3} the same treatment.

2.

In view of the same, the applications are disposed of on the same terms as are appearing in paragraphs No.2, 3, 4 and 5 of order dated 7th December, 2017 passed in civil application No. 14659 of 2017 and other companion applications. As such, paragraphs No.2, 3, 4 and 5 of the order shall form part and parcel of this order and those paragraphs shall be deemed to have been reiterated here.

3.

Civil applications accordingly stand disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca3795-18