← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4811/2023disposed off

Mohammad Farukh Abdul Qadir v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And ORS

2023-07-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 968 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4811 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 7527 OF 2023 MOHAMMAD FARUKH ABDUL QADIR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS AND 969 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4813 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 7523 OF 2023 ABDUL QUDIR ABDUL WAHED DIED THR LRS MOHAMMAD FARUKH ABDUL KADIR DESHMUKH AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS AND 970 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4814 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 7525 OF 2023 ABDUL HADI ABDUL BARI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS AND 971 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4816 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 7529 OF 2023 MOHAMMAD ANWAR ABDUL KADIR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS 1/3

...

Mr. A.H. Koralkar - Advocate for Applicants Mr. B.V. Virdhe, Mr. S.P. Tiwari and Mr. S.N. Kendre - AGP's for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. R.B. Deshpande - Advocate for Respondent No.3 in Civil Application No. 4813 of 2023 ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 11th July, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.

The learned A.G.P. as well as the learned Counsel for the acquiring body in one matter strongly opposed the applications on the ground that, no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods.

4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in 2/3

these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay.

5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE 3/3