← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4534/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Isak Dastgir Tamboli v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2018-02-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane2 pages

4534.16WP FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 4534 OF 2016 ISAK DASTGIR TAMBOLI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for petitioner : Mr.R.D. Biradar AGP for the respondent/State:Mr.A.R. Borulkar Advocate for respondent No.4 : Mr. D.S. Mali Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6:Mr.N.B. Ghute ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.

Dated: February 02, 2018 ...

We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents for some time.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner will file the Review Application. He may be allowed to take all the contentions raised in this Petition in the proposed Review Application. He further submits

4534.16WP that, time spent in filing and prosecuting this Petition may be considered while considering the prayer of the petitioner for delay in filing the proposed Review Application. He prays two weeks time to file the Review Application. Time granted as prayed for.

3.

In the circumstances, Writ Petition stands disposed of.

4.

We make it clear that, ad-interim relief granted in Writ Petition shall continue to remain in force for two weeks.

(S. M. GAVHANE, J) (S.S. SHINDE,J) SGA/