Bombay High CourtCA/6618/2014admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Latur And Another v. Tukaram Namdeo Bhande

2015-12-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

{1} 936 cod.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6616 OF 2014 IN FAST/7509/2014 WITH CA/6618/2014 IN FAST/7560/2014 WITH CA/6620/2014 IN FAST/7564/2014 WITH CA/6622/2014 IN FAST/7569/2014 WITH CA/6624/2014 IN FAST/7574/2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

ISHWAR RAOSAHEB BHANDE ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S.P. Sonpawle, Assistant Govt. Pleader Advocate for respondent No.1 : Mr.V.G. Sakolkar. CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 1ST DECEMBER,2015.

PER COURT:

1] Heard.

2] The applications for condonation of delay in appeal is opposed by the learned counsel for non applicant by contending that the delay is not at all sufficiently explained.

3] Perusal of the applications shows that the delay is sufficiently explained. Averments therein are not controverted by filing counter. Hence, applications are allowed. Delay in filing First Appeal is condoned. [A.M. BADAR, J] grt/-