Satish Panjumal Tekwani And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 106 WRIT PETITION NO.3418 OF 2018 SATISH PANJUMAL TEKWANI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners: Mr Hawale Atul B.

AGP for Respondents: Mr S.B. Pulkundwar Advocate for Respondent No.4:Mr. Girish K. Thigale Naik

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 15th April, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed application seeking rental compensation with the competent authority however no step has been taken on it as yet.

2.

In case the application is filed by the petitioner seeking rental compensation (Exh. C Page

33) then the competent authority shall take decision upon it in accordance with law and after hearing both the parties, expeditiously, preferably within nine months.

3.

Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

(A. M.DHAVALE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) JPC 1/1