Bombay High CourtCA/5342/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Changdev Arjun Dahifale v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2019-12-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil1 pages

907CA5339.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5339 OF 2019 IN FAST/7734/2019 WITH CA/5337/2019 IN FAST/7738/2019 WITH CA/5338/2019 IN FAST/7747/2019 WITH CA/5340/2019 IN FAST/7745/2019 WITH CA/5342/2019 IN FAST/7741/2019 WITH CA/5343/2019 IN FAST/7749/2019 WITH CA/5344/2019 IN FAST/7743/2019 WITH CA/5345/2019 IN FAST/7736/2019 VAIJANATH PANDURANG DAHIFALE AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS Advocate for Appellants : Mr. B.R. Kedar.

Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. R.B. Bagul.

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : .06.12.2019 PER COURT :

Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned AGP. 2.

The acquiring boy has been duly served but none appears. 3.

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, delay of 1683 days are condoned, subject to the condition that the applicants - claimants shall not be entitled to claim any interest for the period of delay. ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) S.P.C.

1/1